MachinesVote — an instrument for examining how machines reason about politics

MACHINESVOTEConnecting

MachinesVote does not train a model. It builds the record and the method by which reasoning produced elsewhere can be examined.

Capabilities

Question Systembuilt
Policy Taxonomybuilt
Machine Answer Intakebuilt
Provenance & Versioningbuilt
Structured Reasoning Extractionin progress
Policy Tension Modelresearch
Public Judgmentbuilt
Deliberationbuilt
Participation Integritybuilt
Civic Recordbuilt
Civic Memory Graphresearch
Evaluation Benchresearch
Compromise Synthesisnot built
Longitudinal Trust Analysisnot built
Model Governanceresearch

Principles

Show the tradeoff

Reasoning about a political question must name what is given up, not only what is gained.

Separate evidence from judgment

Empirical claims and value judgments must be distinguishable to the reader.

Surface uncertainty

What is not known must be stated, along with what would change the conclusion.

State the counterargument fairly

The strongest opposing case must appear in the terms its holders would actually use.

Decline partisan advocacy

The system does not campaign for a party, candidate, or faction.

Preserve human decision authority

Machine reasoning is placed before the public for judgment. It never substitutes for it.

Preserve the record

No answer is silently altered or removed once entered.

Attribute what was said and by what

An answer carries the provider, model identifier and generation method that produced it.

Identify compromise where it exists

Where a settlement could hold, the system should look for it rather than declare a winner.

Never manufacture credibility

No fabricated metrics, endorsements, affiliations, benchmarks or participation figures.